From 3af5bbab4a8a544894f9e68a3ca41abc9efabf96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephane Bortzmeyer Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 16:59:05 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Hunting down non-HTTPS links --- TODO | 3 +-- index.xml | 11 +++++++---- register-new-subtag.xml | 6 +++--- test-suites.xml | 10 ++++++---- why-tagging.xml | 2 +- 5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index fbb0555..fdf73b6 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ * HTTPS for all links (grep http:// *.xml) -* lsr.atom (requires some porting) * link to find-subtags -* post search engine +* validity HTML and CSS and Atom diff --git a/index.xml b/index.xml index 4574222..ca0a1e3 100644 --- a/index.xml +++ b/index.xml @@ -5,13 +5,16 @@
  • What are language tags?
  • Why tagging?
  • Tag wisely
    • -
  • The Wikipedia article
    • +
  • The Wikipedia +article
    • +
  • Search the language registry
  • The excellent article from the W3C about language tags
    • -
  • Also from the W3C, a tutorial "Declaring Language in XHTML and HTML"
    • -
  • Search subtags online in the registry (some explanations are provided, but this tool is more useful if you know the concepts behind the registry)
    • -
  • Browse language tags and see their meaning
    • +
  • Also from the W3C, a tutorial "Declaring Language in XHTML and HTML"
    • +
  • Another +way to search subtags online in the registry (some explanations are provided, but this tool is more useful if you know the concepts behind the registry)
    • +
  • Browse language tags and see their meaning
    • diff --git a/register-new-subtag.xml b/register-new-subtag.xml index fef566d..2b772ad 100644 --- a/register-new-subtag.xml +++ b/register-new-subtag.xml @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ probably already there. But, if it is not, you can ask for the registration of a new subtag. This text explains how, but the complete and authoritative explanation is in RFC 5646, -specially its section 3.5, Registration Procedure for Subtags". It is +specially its section 3.5, Registration Procedure for Subtags". It is recommended to read at least this section.

    Before you start, a warning: the process takes time, documentation and the ability to defend your proposal and to back it with facts and @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ you want the IETF to make another choice). We then concentrate on "variant" subtags.

    The process is the following (it is a simplified version; did I -tell you to read the full story in section 3.5 of section 3.5 of RFC 5646?):

    1. Collect background information, typically references to published @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ descriptions of the language or dialect. A Wikipedia page is possible but may be insufficient, specially since the page may change easily. Stable references are preferred.
    2. Choose a subtag which must conform to the syntax rules explained -in RFC 5646 (section 2.1). A variant subtag must be either a string of +in RFC 5646 (section 2.1). A variant subtag must be either a string of five to eight alphanumeric characters, or a string of four alphanumeric characters, starting with a digit. So, valencian is illegal diff --git a/test-suites.xml b/test-suites.xml index 5419b60..cce6b73 100644 --- a/test-suites.xml +++ b/test-suites.xml @@ -13,12 +13,14 @@ whitespace optional-comment": 2006-11-15 registry, they may be valid now, the current registry is !)
      3. -
    3. ICU test suite
      4. +
    4. ICU test suite, now apparently only in +the Android source code
    5. From the grammar in -the RFC, you can use programs like abnfgen or eusthathius to generate tags for testing a +the RFC, you can use programs like abnfgen or eusthathius to generate tags for testing a parser. Warning: these tags will follow the grammar but may not be well-formed, since some rules are not in the grammar (for instance the rule that no two singletons must be identical).
      6. - \ No newline at end of file + diff --git a/why-tagging.xml b/why-tagging.xml index 9d29397..cd53238 100644 --- a/why-tagging.xml +++ b/why-tagging.xml @@ -61,6 +61,6 @@ because it brings no short-term benefits. Things are becoming better but certainly too slowly.

      More readings