From b9b8878a24fc84fc8798e28099811f6ac904d0dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sunoc <sunoc@localhost>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:29:07 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Translated by sunoc

---
 omegat/project_save.tmx | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/omegat/project_save.tmx b/omegat/project_save.tmx
index a5b8e85..a2a840e 100644
--- a/omegat/project_save.tmx
+++ b/omegat/project_save.tmx
@@ -27398,6 +27398,14 @@ appelé Scheme.</seg>
         <seg>@code{message}%d%s@code{(- fill-column 32)}@code{concat}</seg>
       </tuv>
     </tu>
+    <tu>
+      <tuv lang="en">
+        <seg>In this experiment with the @code{+}, what we did was cause the Lisp interpreter to evaluate the @code{+} and look for the value of the variable instead of the function definition.</seg>
+      </tuv>
+      <tuv lang="fr" changeid="sunoc" changedate="20241121T072906Z" creationid="sunoc" creationdate="20241121T072906Z">
+        <seg>Dans ce teste avec le @code{+}, ce que nous avons fait a forcé l'interpréteur Lisp à évaluer le @code{+} et chercher la valeur de la variable plutôt que la définition de fonction.</seg>
+      </tuv>
+    </tu>
     <tu>
       <tuv lang="en">
         <seg>In this manual, we will often speak of keys like @kbd{C-n} as commands, even though strictly speaking the key is bound to a command.</seg>