Improved traverseLeaves implementation: Faster and a bit better understandable
This commit is contained in:
parent
d72e7c2acd
commit
8beb5bac0b
@ -36,12 +36,11 @@ void BlobOnBlocks::traverseLeaves(uint64_t beginByte, uint64_t sizeBytes, functi
|
|||||||
uint64_t endByte = beginByte + sizeBytes;
|
uint64_t endByte = beginByte + sizeBytes;
|
||||||
uint32_t firstLeaf = beginByte / _datatree->maxBytesPerLeaf();
|
uint32_t firstLeaf = beginByte / _datatree->maxBytesPerLeaf();
|
||||||
uint32_t endLeaf = utils::ceilDivision(endByte, _datatree->maxBytesPerLeaf());
|
uint32_t endLeaf = utils::ceilDivision(endByte, _datatree->maxBytesPerLeaf());
|
||||||
bool traversingOutOfRange = _datatree->numStoredBytes() < endByte; //TODO numBytes() inefficient
|
_datatree->traverseLeaves(firstLeaf, endLeaf, [&func, beginByte, endByte, endLeaf](DataLeafNode *leaf, uint32_t leafIndex) {
|
||||||
_datatree->traverseLeaves(firstLeaf, endLeaf, [&func, beginByte, endByte, endLeaf, traversingOutOfRange](DataLeafNode *leaf, uint32_t leafIndex) {
|
|
||||||
uint64_t indexOfFirstLeafByte = leafIndex * leaf->maxStoreableBytes();
|
uint64_t indexOfFirstLeafByte = leafIndex * leaf->maxStoreableBytes();
|
||||||
uint32_t dataBegin = utils::maxZeroSubtraction(beginByte, indexOfFirstLeafByte);
|
uint32_t dataBegin = utils::maxZeroSubtraction(beginByte, indexOfFirstLeafByte);
|
||||||
uint32_t dataEnd = std::min((uint64_t)leaf->maxStoreableBytes(), endByte - indexOfFirstLeafByte);
|
uint32_t dataEnd = std::min((uint64_t)leaf->maxStoreableBytes(), endByte - indexOfFirstLeafByte);
|
||||||
if (leafIndex == endLeaf-1 && traversingOutOfRange) {
|
if (leafIndex == endLeaf-1 && leaf->numBytes() < dataEnd) {
|
||||||
// If we are traversing an area that didn't exist before, then the last leaf was just created with a wrong size. We have to fix it.
|
// If we are traversing an area that didn't exist before, then the last leaf was just created with a wrong size. We have to fix it.
|
||||||
leaf->resize(dataEnd);
|
leaf->resize(dataEnd);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user