Better fix for Cache race condition

This commit is contained in:
Sebastian Messmer 2015-10-01 01:52:21 +02:00
parent 90471ea6a3
commit 942a627173

View File

@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ void Cache<Key, Value>::_popOldEntries() {
// to be called in parallel. The call to _popOldEntry() is synchronized to avoid race conditions,
// but the Value destructor is called in this function which is not synchronized.
// The shared upgrade_lock in here takes care that no push() or pop() operation is running while old entries are deleted.
// The shared upgrade_lock in here takes care that no push() or pop() operation is running while an old entry is deleted.
// This would cause race conditions because pop() could return none before the destructor of the deleted element
// has finished running. Since the destructor of a cached newly created block creates it in the base block store,
// there would be a state where the block can neither be found by a pop() in the cache, nor in the base store.
@ -106,10 +106,13 @@ void Cache<Key, Value>::_popOldEntries() {
// The shared lock is then upgraded to a unique lock in _popOldEntry, so that only one thread can work on the
// _cachedBlocks vector at the same time.
// There is a regression test case for this: CacheTest_RaceCondition:PopBlocksWhileRequestedElementIsThrownOut.
boost::upgrade_lock<boost::shared_mutex> lock(_mutex);
boost::optional<Value> oldEntry = _popOldEntry(&lock);
while (oldEntry != boost::none) {
oldEntry = _popOldEntry(&lock);
while (true) {
boost::upgrade_lock<boost::shared_mutex> lock(_mutex);
boost::optional<Value> oldEntry = _popOldEntry(&lock);
if (oldEntry == boost::none) {
break;
}
oldEntry = boost::none; // Call destructor (inside shared lock)
}
}