hardcoresushi/libcryfs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity

Performance improvement: Allow more parallelity when getting read()/write() syscalls to the same blob

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Sebastian Messmer 2016-07-05 23:02:59 -07:00
parent ff0ba06846
commit a242076ecc
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
src/blobstore/implementations/onblocks/datatreestore/DataTree.cpp
View File

@ -159,7 +159,8 @@ uint32_t DataTree::_numLeaves(const DataNode &node) const {
void DataTree::traverseLeaves(uint32_t beginIndex, uint32_t endIndex, function<void (DataLeafNode*, uint32_t)> func) {
//TODO Can we traverse in parallel?
unique_lock<shared_mutex> lock(_mutex); //TODO Only lock when resizing. Otherwise parallel read/write to a blob is not possible!
boost::upgrade_lock<shared_mutex> lock(_mutex); //TODO Rethink locking here. We probably need locking when the traverse resizes the blob. Otherwise, parallel traverse should be possible. We already allow it below by freeing the upgrade_lock, but we currently only allow it if ALL traverses are entirely inside the valid region. Can we allow more parallelity?
auto exclusiveLock = std::make_unique<boost::upgrade_to_unique_lock<shared_mutex>>(lock);
ASSERT(beginIndex <= endIndex, "Invalid parameters");
if (0 == endIndex) {
// In this case the utils::ceilLog(_, endIndex) below would fail
@ -195,6 +196,7 @@ void DataTree::traverseLeaves(uint32_t beginIndex, uint32_t endIndex, function<v
});
} else {
//We are traversing entirely inside the valid region
exclusiveLock.reset(); // we can allow parallel traverses, if all are entirely inside the valid region.
_traverseLeaves(_rootNode.get(), 0, beginIndex, endIndex, func);
}
}