hardcoresushi
/
libgocryptfs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity

Utimens: Use UtimesNano instead of Futimes 

Futimes() only takes microsecond resolution while the FUSE call
Utimens() wants nanosecond precision.

This is why UTIME_OMIT did not work - this change fixes the
xfstests generic/258 test failure.

The go library does not provide a FutimesNano() function which is
why I use UtimesNano() on /proc/self/fd/n.
This is what the Go library does in Futimes().
This commit is contained in:
Jakob Unterwurzacher 2015-10-04 20:32:15 +02:00
parent c7313f36de
commit aa082c235a
1 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
pathfs_frontend/file.go
View File

@ -341,23 +341,23 @@ const _UTIME_NOW = ((1 << 30) - 1)
const _UTIME_OMIT = ((1 << 30) - 2)
func (f *file) Utimens(a *time.Time, m *time.Time) fuse.Status {
tv := make([]syscall.Timeval, 2)
ts := make([]syscall.Timespec, 2)
if a == nil {
tv[0].Usec = _UTIME_OMIT
ts[0].Nsec = _UTIME_OMIT
} else {
n := a.UnixNano()
tv[0] = syscall.NsecToTimeval(n)
ts[0].Sec = a.Unix()
}
if m == nil {
tv[1].Usec = _UTIME_OMIT
ts[1].Nsec = _UTIME_OMIT
} else {
n := a.UnixNano()
tv[1] = syscall.NsecToTimeval(n)
ts[1].Sec = m.Unix()
}
f.lock.Lock()
err := syscall.Futimes(int(f.fd.Fd()), tv)
fn := fmt.Sprintf("/proc/self/fd/%d", f.fd.Fd())
err := syscall.UtimesNano(fn, ts)
f.lock.Unlock()
return fuse.ToStatus(err)
}