This commit defines all exit codes in one place in the exitcodes
package.
Also, it adds a test to verify the exit code on incorrect
password, which is what SiriKali cares about the most.
Fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/77 .
Misspell Finds commonly misspelled English words
gocryptfs/internal/configfile/scrypt.go
Line 41: warning: "paramter" is a misspelling of "parameter" (misspell)
gocryptfs/internal/ctlsock/ctlsock_serve.go
Line 1: warning: "implementes" is a misspelling of "implements" (misspell)
gocryptfs/tests/test_helpers/helpers.go
Line 27: warning: "compatability" is a misspelling of "compatibility" (misspell)
Now looks like this:
$ ./gocryptfs -version
gocryptfs [GitVersion not set - please compile using ./build.bash]; go-fuse [GitVersionFuse not set - please compile using ./build.bash]; 0000-00-00 go1.8
Hopefully easier to grep for.
Linux by default has a soft limit of 1024 and a hard limit of
4096 on open files. We can increase it so 4096 without root
permissions.
This should help reduce the risk of gocryptfs running out of
file descriptors, as reported at
https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/82 .
This can happen during normal operation, and is harmless since
14038a1644
"fusefrontend: readFileID: reject files that consist only of a header"
causes dormant header-only files to be rewritten on the next write.
This test reproduces the problem xfstests generic/124 uncovered.
The warning itself is harmless, but we should either (1) add locking
so that this cannot happen anymore or (2) drop the warning.
Currently fails:
$ go test -v
=== RUN Test1980Tar
--- PASS: Test1980Tar (0.00s)
=== RUN TestCtlSock
--- PASS: TestCtlSock (0.10s)
=== RUN TestOpenTruncateRead
--- PASS: TestOpenTruncateRead (0.00s)
=== RUN TestWORead
--- PASS: TestWORead (0.00s)
=== RUN TestXfs124
cipherSize 18 == header size: interrupted write?
-wpanic turns this warning into a panic: cipherSize 18 == header size: interrupted write?
We do not have to track the writeOnly status because the kernel
will not forward read requests on a write-only FD to us anyway.
I have verified this behavoir manually on a 4.10.8 kernel and also
added a testcase.
As reported at https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/105 ,
the "ioutil.WriteFile(file, iv, 0400)" call causes "permissions denied"
errors on an NFSv4 setup.
"strace"ing diriv creation and gocryptfs.conf creation shows this:
conf (works on the user's NFSv4 mount):
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/a/gocryptfs.conf.tmp", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_CLOEXEC, 0400) = 3
diriv (fails):
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/a/gocryptfs.diriv", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|O_CLOEXEC, 0400) = 3
This patch creates the diriv file with the same flags that are used for
creating the conf:
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/a/gocryptfs.diriv", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_CLOEXEC, 0400) = 3
Closes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/105
Force decode of encrypted files even if the integrity check fails, instead of
failing with an IO error. Warning messages are still printed to syslog if corrupted
files are encountered.
It can be useful to recover files from disks with bad sectors or other corrupted
media.
Closes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/pull/102 .
go-fuse has added a new method to the nodefs.File interface that
caused this build error:
internal/fusefrontend/file.go:75: cannot use file literal (type *file) as type nodefs.File in return argument:
*file does not implement nodefs.File (missing Flock method)
Fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/104 and
prevents the problem from happening again.
The volatile inode numbers that we used before cause "find" to complain and error out.
Virtual inode numbers are derived from their parent file inode number by adding 10^19,
which is hopefully large enough no never cause problems in practice.
If the backing directory contains inode numbers higher than that, stat() on these files
will return EOVERFLOW.
Example directory lising after this change:
$ ls -i
926473 gocryptfs.conf
1000000000000926466 gocryptfs.diriv
944878 gocryptfs.longname.hmZojMqC6ns47eyVxLlH2ailKjN9bxfosi3C-FR8mjA
1000000000000944878 gocryptfs.longname.hmZojMqC6ns47eyVxLlH2ailKjN9bxfosi3C-FR8mjA.name
934408 Tdfbf02CKsTaGVYnAsSypA
Note: find currently complains like this:
find: failed to read file names from file system at or below
‘/tmp/linux-3.0.reverse.mnt.vNI’: No such file or directory
I have analyzed this and it is caused by the non-stable inode numbers
that gocryptfs -reverse uses. Will be fixed in a later commit.
This PR addresses the Issue #95, about "Confusing file owner for
longname files in reverse mode".
It affects only the reverse mode, and introduces two
modifications:
1) The "gocryptfs.longname.XXXX.name" files are assigned the owner and
group of the underlying plaintext file. Therefore it is consistent
with the file "gocryptfs.longname.XXXX" that has the encrypted
contents of the plaintext file.
2) The two virtual files mentioned above are given -r--r--r--
permissions. This is consistent with the behavior described in
function Access in internal/fusefrontend_reverse/rfs.go where all
virtual files are always readable. Behavior also observed in point
c) in #95 .
Issue #95 URL: https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/95
Pull request URL: https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/pull/97
