We need
fd7328faf9
to fix a crash reported in https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/430 :
2019/10/30 17:14:16 Unknown opcode 2016
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x20 pc=0x508d38]
This patch is only in the v2.x.x branch. Upgrade to v2, as the
old API is also supported there.
Running
git grep hanwen/go-fuse | grep -v hanwen/go-fuse/v2
to check for forgotten references comes back clean.
CheckTrailingGarbage was called even when "-passfile" was
used, which is stupid, and causes false positives:
https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/391
(false error "Received trailing garbage after the password"
when using -passfile in .bash_profile)
Instead of trying to improve the logic to handle that case
and make everything even more complicated, delete the function.
It is unclear if actually helps in some cases, and it definitely
harms as shown by the above bug report.
This adds support for gitignore-like wildcards and exclude patters in
reverse mode. It (somewhat) fixes#273: no regexp support, but the
syntax should be powerful enough to satisfy most needs.
Also, since adding a lot of --exclude options can be tedious, it adds
the --exclude-from option to read patterns from a file (or files).
Go version go1.10.7 linux/amd64 complains with:
internal/fusefrontend_reverse/rfs.go:333: declaration of "entries" shadows
declaration at internal/fusefrontend_reverse/rfs.go:327
Fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/286 :
While the actual file is properly excluded, the * .name file is still leaked in the directory listing:
```
drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastian sebastian 4,0K Dez 17 14:58 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 sebastian sebastian 4,0K Dez 17 14:45 ..
-r-------- 1 sebastian sebastian 408 Dez 17 14:56 gocryptfs.conf
-r--r--r-- 1 sebastian sebastian 16 Dez 17 14:58 gocryptfs.diriv
-r--r--r-- 1 sebastian sebastian 320 Dez 17 14:58 gocryptfs.longname.3vZ_r3eDPb1_fL3j5VA4rd_bcKWLKT9eaxOVIGK5HFA.name
```
Excluded files showed up in directory listing like this:
drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastian sebastian 4,0K Dez 17 14:48 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 sebastian sebastian 4,0K Dez 17 14:45 ..
-????????? ? ? ? ? ? abcd
-r-------- 1 sebastian sebastian 366 Dez 17 14:45 gocryptfs.conf
Fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/285
The function used to do two things:
1) Walk the directory tree in a manner safe from symlink attacks
2) Open the final component in the mode requested by the caller
This change drops (2), which was only used once, and lets the caller
handle it. This simplifies the function and makes it fit for reuse in
forward mode in openBackingPath(), and for using O_PATH on Linux.
Both fusefrontend and fusefrontend_reverse were doing
essentially the same thing, move it into main's
initFuseFrontend.
A side-effect is that we have a reference to cryptocore
in main, which will help with wiping the keys on exit
(https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/211).
Steps to reproduce:
* Create a regular reverse mount point
* Create a file "test" in the original directory
* Access the corresponding encrypted directory in the mount point (ls <encrypted dir>)
* Quickly delete the file in the original data - instead create a device node
* Access the file again, it will access the device node and attempt to read from it
Fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/187
Unfortunately, faccessat in Linux ignores AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW,
so this is not completely atomic.
Given that the information you get from access is not very
interesting, it seems good enough.
https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/165
...by using the new OpenNofollow helper.
The benchmark shows a small but acceptable performance loss:
$ ./benchmark-reverse.bash
LS: 2.182
CAT: 18.221
Tracking ticket: https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/165
If the symlink target gets too long due to base64 encoding, we should
return ENAMETOOLONG instead of having the kernel reject the data and
returning an I/O error to the user.
Fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/167
Fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/168
Steps to reproduce the problem:
* Create a regular reverse mount point
* Create files with the same very long name in multiple directories - so far
everything works as expected, and it will appear with a different name each
time, for example, gocryptfs.longname.A in directory A and
gocryptfs.longname.B in directory B
* Try to access a path with A/gocryptfs.longname.B or B/gocryptfs.longname.A -
this should fail, but it actually works.
The problem is that the longname cache only uses the path as key and not the
dir or divIV. Assume an attacker can directly interact with a reverse mount and
knows the relation longname path -> unencoded path in one directory, it allows
to test if the same unencoded filename appears in any other directory.
A file with a name of exactly 176 bytes length caused this error:
ls: cannot access ./tmp/dsg/sXSGJLTuZuW1FarwIkJs0w/b6mGjdxIRpaeanTo0rbh0A/QjMRrQZC_4WLhmHI1UOBcA/gocryptfs.longname.QV-UipdDXeUVdl05WruoEzBNPrQCfpu6OzJL0_QnDKY: No such file or directory
ls: cannot access ./tmp/dsg/sXSGJLTuZuW1FarwIkJs0w/b6mGjdxIRpaeanTo0rbh0A/QjMRrQZC_4WLhmHI1UOBcA/gocryptfs.longname.QV-UipdDXeUVdl05WruoEzBNPrQCfpu6OzJL0_QnDKY.name: No such file or directory
-????????? ? ? ? ? ? gocryptfs.longname.QV-UipdDXeUVdl05WruoEzBNPrQCfpu6OzJL0_QnDKY
-????????? ? ? ? ? ? gocryptfs.longname.QV-UipdDXeUVdl05WruoEzBNPrQCfpu6OzJL0_QnDKY.name
Root cause was a wrong shortNameMax constant that failed to
account for the obligatory padding byte.
Fix the constant and also expand the TestLongnameStat test case
to test ALL file name lengths from 1-255 bytes.
Fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/143 .
Remove the "Masterkey" field from fusefrontend.Args because it
should not be stored longer than neccessary. Instead pass the
masterkey as a separate argument to the filesystem initializers.
Then overwrite it with zeros immediately so we don't have
to wait for garbage collection.
Note that the crypto implementation still stores at least a
masterkey-derived value, so this change makes it harder, but not
impossible, to extract the encryption keys from memory.
Suggested at https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/137
