* simplify ciphers
- let's not encourage (remove options 1, 2) changing your cipher suite FP
- remove "it's quite technical ..." (everything is technical to someone), trim to one line
- add test link so users can just see that it's FP'able
- reinforce not to fuck with the cipher suite in the cipher's sub-section
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security:Renegotiation describes
> **the new default behaviour** that was introduced in experimental mozilla-central nightly versions on 2010-02-08
where the last step is
> - should the server (or a MITM) request **renegotiation**, Mozilla will terminate the connection with an error message
and then after talking about breakage ...
> The above defaults may break some client/server environments where a Server is still using old software and requires renegotiation.
mentions workarounds to reduce said breakage:
> In order to give such environments a way to keep using Firefox (et.al.) to connect to their vulnerable server infrastructure, the following preferences are available:
specifically talking about the first 2 prefs listed there, one allowing to specify a list of hosts "where renegotiation may be performed" and the 2nd one "completely disables the new protection mechanisms".
But both those prefs were removed in FF38, meaning that since then it's no longer possible to disable the default behaviour that is "should the server (or a MITM) request **renegotiation**, Mozilla will terminate the connection with an error message".
But all of this is about the **re**-negotiation part and not negotiation. And nowhere does it say "insecure" renegotiation, which, as I read it, means that FF will terminate the connection for any kind of **renegotiation**, safe or unsafe.
1201 controls the negotiation part:
> This pref controls the behaviour during the initial negotiation between client and server.
> If set to true, a Mozilla client will reject all connection attempts to servers that are still using the old SSL/TLS protocol and which might be vulnerable to the attack.
> Setting this preference to “true” is the only way to guarantee full protection against the attack.
I think "servers that are still using the old SSL/TLS protocol" actually means servers that **only** support the old protocols.
Servers still supporting those old protocols in addition to some new protocol versions should not be affected by this pref because FF will be able to negotiate to use one of the newer protocol versions.
Ergo lets fix the title and remove the line about renegotiation support because I think that's irrelevant.
ps. the sslpulse link is nice and I'd like to keep it somewhere but it doesn't really fit in 1201 IMO so I moved it to 1202.
- split geo related vs language/locale related
- rip out intl.locale.requested
- rip out intl.regional_prefs.use_os_locales
- add intl.charset.fallback.override
it rode the train in 69... after a bumpy ride in 68 where it was backed out. Note: it still has some issues. Suggest users wipe the site permissions once upgraded to 69
with `plugins.click_to_play` deprecated in FF69, no-one here is sure if `intervalInMinutes` still applies to Flash or even works, and no-one here cares about Flash. Happy to let Mozilla just keep restricting it more and more until it's deprecated in early 2020. Note: we already disable flash anyway in pref 1803.
- EFF has pretty pictures and stuff and explains the issues (replaces wikipedia which people can still search for)
- tor issue doesn't hold anything important (out it goes)
- moz wiki page I'll leave in for the bugzilla links if someone wants to research how it's all meant to work
I don't think we need a 4 yr old article to explain the concept of `.min` (or `.max`), it's pretty self explanatory (and SSL 3 is obsolete). Three lines of text culled, and one of the remaining http links eliminated as a bonus. Enjoy the saved bytes and mouse-scrolling.
- no need to enforce defaults (except the second cross-origin) = less items in prefs and about:support
- simplify header info
- add in that you need an extension for real control: i.e for most people, e.g I use uMatrix and have never can to whitelist anything. Kolanich has been on settings of 2 for years and only found one broken site: these are anecdotal and don;t reflect the real world: which is why the settings are pretty relaxed
- move the broken info out of header and onto the pref in a setup tag
- reference: https://github.com/ghacksuserjs/ghacks-user.js/issues/716#issuecomment-488527274
- thanks Kolanich and 🐈
- 0910 same as default for desktop. Android is the opposite, must be for a reason. Android is not really my concern.
- 1005: always been inactive: one less warning to deal with
- 1008: always been inactive. defaults are 60, 60
All of these are the same as default, checked back to ESR60 and Ff60. Except 2211 which is not considered an issue by TB for example, and it doesn't enhance anything IMO
Lets be consistent, we don't make min active as it alters your FP, and the risk is super low (updated the telemetry stat: down from 2% to 0.5%). Default max is now 4 anyway (don't care about ESR - they should be using the v60 archive).
Instead of being inactive, remove this. WebRTC is already blocked. And it can also be controlled by 1820. Redundant and does nothing extra for privacy, security etc
At best disabling the background update of gmp means not only an extra item for those who wish to use it (e.g widevine, netflix) to have to deal with, but also a time delay in getting the actual download. At worst, it could cause users to use an old dll (security risk).
I will leave it in, for now, but am seriously considering removing it, so don't cry if I do.
- SB: disabling it nothing to enhance privacy/security etc if changed from default
- SB: I will not provide the prefs or encourage users to disable these, especially given that there is a UI
- SB: the urls are redundant
- SB: note: the binary checks stays
- TP section is out of date (or soon will be), I'm not maintaining it, it has a UI and is best handled there
- explain pitfalls, add keyword tip, add setup tag
- given the searchbar is hidden by default in new FF installs, a lot of people could find this incredibly annoying (not being able to hit enter), including users who have changed their search engine - hence the setup tag
- these are not needed, you can view your cache in about:cache, or look at your `profile/cache2` folder (at least for portable Firefox), the remaining pref is enough to achieve the desired result
- browser.cache.disk.smart_size.first_run is set internally (for me it got automatically reset to modified false)
- the other two prefs are just more things for users to have deal with if they want to use disk cache
- Used setup-web since it relates to actual web pages, even though it doesn't break them
- Added the tag because it's an item that is likely to get attention / troubleshooting
- Added a warning tag to make the risk more apparent.
- Slight edit to the 2803 references
- to avoid confusion with the setting tag, split the prefs into separate numbers, thus shove 2031->2031, reuse 2031
- remove the default value notation as Mozilla will roll out default change gradually to users
TAAR is extension recommendations in the "Add-ons Manager" (not sure how it's displayed)
CFR is extension recommendations as you browse the web, via a drop down panel
- description needs to stay changed from just cookies since it also clears site data
- keep the info about n days out of it, it's just messy (ESR users should be on version 60)
- get the values correct (I mixed them up earlier)
- fixup [setting] path
- leave in one (of two) extra [notes] I previously added
whatever we thought it may have done in the past, it doesn't do that now as far as we know. And it's not an issue since we allow extension update-CHECKs anyway.
regardless of this pref setting: the permissions.sqlite file will still be abused to store a flag for this for every single site you connect to (as third party?) - fun.
* clean up "Firefox Data Collection & Use"
- telemetry prefs to 330's
- Firefox Data Collection & Use prefs to 340's (but leave crash reports in 350s)
- move `app.shield.optoutstudies.enabled` to 330's - this is an internal pref which controls if you get the system addon
- make notes that `datareporting.healthreport.uploadEnabled` controls studies and ext recommendations
- split crash reports better to reflex the UI setting
`browser.urlbar.maxHistoricalSearchSuggestions` is default 0 is FF60 thru to FF66. It is also default 0 in ESR60.1 thru 60.5. (at least on Windows)
IDK if this has ever been used, maybe android, in which case it's probably useful?
The location bar dropdown cannot be disabled via prefs except with css, in which case the whole thing is hidden regardless of he above prefs. So there is no point in making any of them active. This is also in line with what we can achieve with relaxed and hardened tags / sticky issues - that is we can find a better balance, Shoulder surfers is a low risk, not even Tor Browser disables this stuff. People need to take responsibility and/or use common sense. Sure, we can leave em in for users to know about and enable if they want. End of story.
userChrome.css code is
```css
/* locationbar dropdown FF65+ */
#PopupAutoCompleteRichResult {display: none!important;}
```
might as well add it: needs t be taken into consideration when looking at the whole http2 thing. Will be interesting to see what Tor Browser does with it in ESR68
it's too hard to follow AS changes, and work out if disabling showing items (basic toggling of show/hide sections etc) actually stops downloading a localized local copy etc. For items we actually want to block, let the endpoint slaughter begin.
let's just coverage-our-ass on this one
While I don't mind telemetry (development needs meaningful feedback to better the product), and I trust the data is not PII, and/or anonymized into buckets etc (you can check this you know), and I understand this one needs to be outside the Telemetry pref in order to gather the one-time ping ... and I trust Mozilla's motives ... I'm starting to get a little annoyed at the non-stop incessant increasing telemetry bullshittery and ass-fuckery around sending data home, and the lengths some Mozilla devs will go to, to hide this info (hidden prefs, access denied tickets to hide discussion of what should be public, and even **not even adhering to their own documentation**).
I will also be killing as many Activity Stream endpoints as well - as long as they are in line with our js - pocket, snippets, onboarding etc. And I will add those from personal as inactive for end-users - eg cfr
remember the new Coverage Telemetry shit? with a **hidden** opt-out pref? guess what, they are already collecting for 3 months ...
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1487578 - **3 months ago**: "I see data coming in that looks reasonable"
guess what else ...
"It has also replaced the previous version that was there (from bug 1480194)" and oh, surprise surprise, 1480194 is ACCESS DENIED!
they're not just using private tickets to hide security critical information from potential hackers and blackhats, no they also use it to hide shady AF things. Things that they fully know are shady as fuck and that they absolutely know a lot of people would not like. There's simply no other reason why they'd do that
but wait, that's not all. If you think an opt-out pref that 99% of people wouldn't know about even if it showed up in about:config BUT ALSO HAPPENS TO BE HIDDEN is kind of questionable, well ... the system addon that they use for this shit apparently looked or still looks for `toolkit.telemetry.coverage.opt-out` [1] instead of `toolkit.coverage.opt-out` as their documentation [2] claims
[1] https://github.com/mozilla/one-off-system-add-ons/pull/131/files#diff-6e0cbf76986d04383ccb32a29ef27a7aR25
[2] https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/tip/toolkit/components/telemetry/docs/data/coverage-ping.rst#l32
It's time to opt out of all that shit for good. Disable system addon updates and kill it at the root
> In FF61 and lower, you will not get any System Add-on updates except when you update Firefox
on its own that's not true. You will get SA updates unless you disable app update checks + auto install. Let's just remove that as well.
* move 1260 to 122x
"disable or limit SHA-1 certificates" is about certs, not ciphers.
Because CERTS is 1st in the title I moved it to the 1st item there because it's arguably also the most important of the lot (and renumbered the rest)
We can also drop HSTS from the subgroup title because there's nothing HSTS left atm.
FYI, the https://www.privacytools.io/webrtc.html test in our wiki is 404, so I gave it a strikethru and added this one. This is also handy for 2001, but do we need to double up on it? We're only disabling WebRTC because of IP leaks, so I don't see the point in testing if WebRTC is disabled.
Session Restore cannot be disabled in Normal mode, it is also used internally. FYI: PB Mode does not use Session Restore. The description is still not 100%, as it refers to what is restored, not what is kept in the recovery.jsonlz4 (at least for tabs)
flipped true in FF54: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1026804 but unsure when the pref itself was introduced. note: other timing prefs were always in 2400's see 4602: [2411] disable resource/navigation timing / 4603: [2412] disable timing attacks
it has zero to do with privacy etc, and in fact most users will only ever encounter it once (and check the box) when they first go to about:config, so it's not even useful as an override or a new profile IMO. This removes one of three numbers that don't have a section
TLS 1.0 and 1.1 are still secure. Sure, later versions are more secure, but 98% of the web is already upgraded - less than 2% of sites use < v1.2. So it's not very likely you would come across a site that requires it, but if you did, what's the point in breaking it. Mozilla and Chrome already have plans to deprecate TLS 1.0 & 1.1, and force that last 2% of sites.
TLS settings can be FP'ed without JS. By sticking with the defaults, I do not see any security issues, but an increase in potential anti-FPing. TBH, the chances of either (i.e being FP'ed with TLS as a entropy point, or being compromised due to TLS<1.2) are slim to non anyway.
Any arguments, please see @earthlng
Pants said "We do not need to keep anything for ESR users. ESR users are on v60, and we have an archived 60 for them."
This isn't even affecting ESR60 but only older versions.
