9d06a61780
Kept wondering wether I should keep the MIT (because I highly value freedom of act) or embrace the GPL (because I don't want this work to become close-source). I do understand that this commit (and the next one that is actually changing the LICENSE) is a defeat for freedom. I guess freedom has been defeated long time ago, when people and companies figured that was "free" (as in gratis) was also "free" (as in disposable). This is not how I think free (as in "libre") works but hey, that surely is how Intel and other corporations see it (ec: Intel Management Engine is entirely based on Minix, is close-source, and *maybe* used as a backdoor by anybody). It boils down to the Paradox of Tolerance, and I surely won't tolerate shit going their way. If you want to take open source stuff, be my guest ; but you have to play by the rules.
21 lines
784 B
Bash
Executable File
21 lines
784 B
Bash
Executable File
#!/usr/bin/env sh
|
|
|
|
######################################################################
|
|
# @author : swytch (adapted from Luke Smith - lukesmith.xyz)
|
|
# @file : setbg
|
|
# @license : GPLv3
|
|
# @created : Wednesday May 20, 2020 18:23:50 CEST
|
|
# @description : set the wallpaper
|
|
######################################################################
|
|
|
|
|
|
# If given an argument
|
|
# if $1 is a png file, set it as a wallpaper
|
|
# if $1 is a directory, choose a randomized image in it, set it as wallpaper
|
|
|
|
[ -f "$1" ] && cp $1 "$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/wall.png" && dunstify -u "low" "Wallpaper changed"
|
|
|
|
[ -d "$1" ] && cp "$(find "$1"/*.png -type f | shuf -n 1)" "$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/wall.png" && dunstify -u "low" "Random wallpaper chosen"
|
|
|
|
xwallpaper --zoom "$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/wall.png"
|