Logically, it makes more sense to provide the steps leading up to the bug before asking what the bug is. This change moves "steps to reproduce" above "expected behavior" and "actual behavior" to enforce the above progression and logical flow.
* Build container image by GitHub Actions
* Trigger docker build only pushed to main branch
* Tweak tagging imgae
- "edge" is the main branch
- "latest" is the tagged latest release
Conflicts:
- `CONTRIBUTING.md`:
Upstream file has changed and we're quoting it.
Ported the changes.
- `README.md`:
Upstream file has changed but we have a completely different one.
Kept our version.
- `lib/mastodon/version.rb`:
Upstream has changed from `tootsuite/mastodon` to `mastodon/mastodon`,
but we're still `glitch-soc/mastodon`.
Kept our version.
- `spec/presenters/instance_presenter_spec.rb`:
Upstream has changed from `tootsuite/mastodon` to `mastodon/mastodon`,
but we're still `glitch-soc/mastodon`.
Kept our version.
* Change references to tootsuite/mastodon to mastodon/mastodon
* Remove obsolete test fixture
* Replace occurrences of tootsuite/mastodon with mastodon/mastodon in CHANGELOG
And a few other places
Conflicts:
- `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md`:
Removed upstream, while we had a checkbox telling people to check if the
issue was present upstream. Removed the file as well.
Conflicts:
- `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md`:
Upstream added the `bug` label to bug reports.
Did the same.
- `app/services/fan_out_on_write_service.rb`:
Upstream put DMs back into timelines, glitch-soc was already doing it.
Ignored upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `.env.production.sample`:
Upstream deleted it, I decided to keep it.
- `package.json`:
Upstream updated a dependency textually too close to wavesurfer.js
which has been deleted from upstream but is kept in glitch-soc for now.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/activitypub/collections_controller.rb`:
Conflict due to glitch-soc having to take care of local-only
pinned toots in that controller.
Took upstream's changes and restored the local-only special
handling.
- `app/controllers/auth/sessions_controller.rb`:
Minor conflicts due to the theming system, applied upstream
changes, adapted the following two files for glitch-soc's
theming system:
- `app/controllers/concerns/sign_in_token_authentication_concern.rb`
- `app/controllers/concerns/two_factor_authentication_concern.rb`
- `app/services/backup_service.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc having to handle local-only
toots specially. Applied upstream changes and restored
the local-only special handling.
- `app/views/admin/custom_emojis/index.html.haml`:
Minor conflict due to the theming system.
- `package.json`:
Upstream dependency updated, too close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency in the file.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dependency updated, too close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency in the file.
Conflicts:
- README.md
- app/helpers/statuses_helper.rb
Upstream moved account helpers to their own file, we had extra
helpers there, moved too.
- app/lib/sanitize_config.rb
- app/models/user.rb
- app/serializers/initial_state_serializer.rb
- config/locales/simple_form.en.yml
- spec/lib/sanitize_config_spec.rb
Conflicts:
- app/models/account.rb
- app/views/settings/profiles/show.html.haml
- spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/credentials_controller_spec.rb
Conflicts were due to an increase in account bio length upstream, which
is already covered in glitch-soc through `MAX_BIO_CHARS`.
Conflicts:
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
Took our version.
- CONTRIBUTING.md
Updated the embedded copy of upstream's version.
- README.md
Took our version.
- app/policies/status_policy.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
- app/views/layouts/embedded.html.haml
Added upstream's changes (dns-prefetch) and fixed
`%body.embed`
- app/views/settings/preferences/show.html.haml
Reverted some of upstream changes, as we have a
page dedicated for flavours and skins.
- config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb
Kept our version of the CSP.
- config/initializers/doorkeeper.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
We don't have releases, so it don't make sense to mention.
On the other hand, a lot of our code is from upstream, so encourage people to
check whether it is a bug in glitch-soc or upstream.
