Unfortunately, faccessat in Linux ignores AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW,
so this is not completely atomic.
Given that the information you get from access is not very
interesting, it seems good enough.
https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/165
In PlaintextNames mode the "gocryptfs.longname." prefix does not have any
special meaning. We should not attempt to delete any .name files.
Partially fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/174
In PlaintextNames mode the "gocryptfs.longname." prefix does not have any
special meaning. We should not attempt to read the directory IV or to
create special .name files.
Partially fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/174
If the user manages to replace the directory with
a symlink at just the right time, we could be tricked
into chown'ing the wrong file.
This change fixes the race by using fchownat, which
unfortunately is not available on darwin, hence a compat
wrapper is added.
Scenario, as described by @slackner at
https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/177 :
1. Create a forward mount point with `plaintextnames` enabled
2. Mount as root user with `allow_other`
3. For testing purposes create a file `/tmp/file_owned_by_root`
which is owned by the root user
4. As a regular user run inside of the GoCryptFS mount:
```
mkdir tempdir
mknod tempdir/file_owned_by_root p &
mv tempdir tempdir2
ln -s /tmp tempdir
```
When the steps are done fast enough and in the right order
(run in a loop!), the device file will be created in
`tempdir`, but the `lchown` will be executed by following
the symlink. As a result, the ownership of the file located
at `/tmp/file_owned_by_root` will be changed.
If the symlink target gets too long due to base64 encoding, we should
return ENAMETOOLONG instead of having the kernel reject the data and
returning an I/O error to the user.
Fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/167
Fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/168
Steps to reproduce the problem:
* Create a regular reverse mount point
* Create files with the same very long name in multiple directories - so far
everything works as expected, and it will appear with a different name each
time, for example, gocryptfs.longname.A in directory A and
gocryptfs.longname.B in directory B
* Try to access a path with A/gocryptfs.longname.B or B/gocryptfs.longname.A -
this should fail, but it actually works.
The problem is that the longname cache only uses the path as key and not the
dir or divIV. Assume an attacker can directly interact with a reverse mount and
knows the relation longname path -> unencoded path in one directory, it allows
to test if the same unencoded filename appears in any other directory.
Fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/170
Steps to reproduce the problem:
* Create a regular forward mount point
* Create a file with a shortname and one with a long filename
* Try to run 'mv <shortname> <longname>'
This should actually work and replace the existing file, but instead it
fails with:
mv: cannot move '<shortname>' to '<longname>': File exists
The problem is the creation of the .name file. If the target already exists
we can safely ignore the EEXIST error and just keep the existing .name file.
Allows to use /dev/random for generating the master key instead of the
default Go implementation. When the kernel random generator has been
properly initialized both are considered equally secure, however:
* Versions of Go prior to 1.9 just fall back to /dev/urandom if the
getrandom() syscall would be blocking (Go Bug #19274)
* Kernel versions prior to 3.17 do not support getrandom(), and there
is no check if the random generator has been properly initialized
before reading from /dev/urandom
This is especially useful for embedded hardware with low-entroy. Please
note that generation of the master key might block indefinitely if the
kernel cannot harvest enough entropy.
The extended TestLongnameStat() exposes a pathological case
when run on ext4, as ext4 reuses inode numbers immediately.
This change modifies the test to not delete the files immediately,
so the inode numbers cannot be reused immediately.
Fix for the underlying issue is a TODO.
A file with a name of exactly 176 bytes length caused this error:
ls: cannot access ./tmp/dsg/sXSGJLTuZuW1FarwIkJs0w/b6mGjdxIRpaeanTo0rbh0A/QjMRrQZC_4WLhmHI1UOBcA/gocryptfs.longname.QV-UipdDXeUVdl05WruoEzBNPrQCfpu6OzJL0_QnDKY: No such file or directory
ls: cannot access ./tmp/dsg/sXSGJLTuZuW1FarwIkJs0w/b6mGjdxIRpaeanTo0rbh0A/QjMRrQZC_4WLhmHI1UOBcA/gocryptfs.longname.QV-UipdDXeUVdl05WruoEzBNPrQCfpu6OzJL0_QnDKY.name: No such file or directory
-????????? ? ? ? ? ? gocryptfs.longname.QV-UipdDXeUVdl05WruoEzBNPrQCfpu6OzJL0_QnDKY
-????????? ? ? ? ? ? gocryptfs.longname.QV-UipdDXeUVdl05WruoEzBNPrQCfpu6OzJL0_QnDKY.name
Root cause was a wrong shortNameMax constant that failed to
account for the obligatory padding byte.
Fix the constant and also expand the TestLongnameStat test case
to test ALL file name lengths from 1-255 bytes.
Fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/143 .
I have added a subset of fsstress-gocryptfs.bash to EncFS as
fsstress-encfs.sh, improving the code a bit.
This change forward-ports these improvements to
fsstress-gocryptfs.bash.
Due to RMW, we always need read permissions on the backing file. This is a
problem if the file permissions do not allow reading (i.e. 0200 permissions).
This patch works around that problem by chmod'ing the file, obtaining a fd,
and chmod'ing it back.
Test included.
Issue reported at: https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/125
This commit defines all exit codes in one place in the exitcodes
package.
Also, it adds a test to verify the exit code on incorrect
password, which is what SiriKali cares about the most.
Fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/77 .
Misspell Finds commonly misspelled English words
gocryptfs/internal/configfile/scrypt.go
Line 41: warning: "paramter" is a misspelling of "parameter" (misspell)
gocryptfs/internal/ctlsock/ctlsock_serve.go
Line 1: warning: "implementes" is a misspelling of "implements" (misspell)
gocryptfs/tests/test_helpers/helpers.go
Line 27: warning: "compatability" is a misspelling of "compatibility" (misspell)
This test reproduces the problem xfstests generic/124 uncovered.
The warning itself is harmless, but we should either (1) add locking
so that this cannot happen anymore or (2) drop the warning.
Currently fails:
$ go test -v
=== RUN Test1980Tar
--- PASS: Test1980Tar (0.00s)
=== RUN TestCtlSock
--- PASS: TestCtlSock (0.10s)
=== RUN TestOpenTruncateRead
--- PASS: TestOpenTruncateRead (0.00s)
=== RUN TestWORead
--- PASS: TestWORead (0.00s)
=== RUN TestXfs124
cipherSize 18 == header size: interrupted write?
-wpanic turns this warning into a panic: cipherSize 18 == header size: interrupted write?
We do not have to track the writeOnly status because the kernel
will not forward read requests on a write-only FD to us anyway.
I have verified this behavoir manually on a 4.10.8 kernel and also
added a testcase.
The filesystem was created with a gocryptfs version that ignored
the HKDF flag (hence everything was actually encrypted WITHOUT hkdf).
Fix it by recreating it.
TestMain() runs all tests twice, once with plaintextnames=true and once
with false. Several tests mount their own filesystem and ignore the
plaintextnames variable. It makes no sense to run them twice, so
skip execution when plaintextnames is set.
Prior to this commit, gocryptfs's reverse mode did not report correct
directory entry sizes for symbolic links, where the dentry size needs to
be the same as the length of a string containing the target path.
This commit corrects this issue and adds a test case to verify the
correctness of the implementation.
This issue was discovered during the use of a strict file copying program
on a reverse-mounted gocryptfs file system.
From the comment:
// CheckTrailingGarbage tries to read one byte from stdin and exits with a
// fatal error if the read returns any data.
// This is meant to be called after reading the password, when there is no more
// data expected. This helps to catch problems with third-party tools that
// interface with gocryptfs.
Test that we get the right timestamp when extracting a tarball.
Also simplify the workaround in doTestUtimesNano() and fix the
fact that it was running no test at all.
The expected allocated sizes are verified for tmpfs and ext4.
btrfs gives different results, but that's not an error.
Also, simplify test_helpers.Du and several code paths.
Fixes#43.
