Fails right now as reported in https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/pull/655
--- FAIL: TestLongnamemax100Reverse (0.09s)
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=64: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=65: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=66: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=67: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=68: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=69: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=70: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=71: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=72: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=73: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=74: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=75: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=76: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=77: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=78: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=79: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=80: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=81: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=82: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=83: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=84: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=85: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=86: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=87: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=88: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=89: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=90: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=91: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=92: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=93: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=94: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=95: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=96: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=97: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=98: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=99: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=100: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=101: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=102: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=103: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=104: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=105: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=106: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=107: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=108: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=109: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=110: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=111: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=112: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=113: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=114: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=115: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=116: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=117: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=118: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=119: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=120: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=121: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=122: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=123: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=124: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=125: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=126: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=127: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=128: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=129: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=130: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=131: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=132: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=133: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=134: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=135: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=136: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=137: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=138: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=139: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=140: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=141: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=142: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=143: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=144: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=145: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=146: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=147: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=148: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=149: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=150: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=151: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=152: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=153: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=154: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=155: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=156: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=157: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=158: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=159: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=160: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=161: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=162: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=163: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=164: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=165: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=166: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=167: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=168: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=169: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=170: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=171: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=172: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=173: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=174: should see a longname now
longnamemax_test.go:104: l=175: should see a longname now
FAIL
https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/pull/655
Unlike the FUSE implementation on Linux, macFUSE doesn't cache the file
attributes from the `LOOKUP` call, so it calls `GETATTR` prior to
accessing a file.
In the case of the `VirtualConfNode` (reverse config file passthrough),
this resulted in the default `GETATTR` implementation returning an empty
result, ultimately resulting in a "permission denied" error.
14:44:14.095207 rx 3: GETATTR n2
14:44:14.095229 tx 3: OK, {tA=1s {M0100000 SZ=0 L=0 0:0 0 0:8954996 A 0.000000 M 0.000000 C 0.000000}}
14:44:14.099943 rx 4: ACCESS n2 {u=501 g=20 r}
14:44:14.099990 tx 4: 13=permission denied
By impementing `Getattr` (from `fs.NodeGetattrer`) on `VirtualConfNode`
this solves the issue.
$ ./crossbuild.bash
[...]
+ GOOS=darwin
+ GOARCH=amd64
+ build
+ go build -tags without_openssl -o /dev/null
internal/fusefrontend/node.go:397:2: duplicate case syscallcompat.RENAME_NOREPLACE (value 0) in switch
previous case at internal/fusefrontend/node.go:397:7
internal/fusefrontend/node.go:397:2: duplicate case syscallcompat.RENAME_EXCHANGE (value 0) in switch
previous case at internal/fusefrontend/node.go:397:7
internal/fusefrontend/node.go:397:2: duplicate case syscallcompat.RENAME_WHITEOUT (value 0) in switch
previous case at internal/fusefrontend/node.go:397:7
internal/fusefrontend/node.go:399:38: duplicate case syscallcompat.RENAME_NOREPLACE | syscallcompat.RENAME_WHITEOUT (value 0) in switch
previous case at internal/fusefrontend/node.go:397:7
This way we get live output, and hopefully see clearer
where things hang if they do.
Also, don't pass on flags to "go vet", the verbose output
is pretty useless.
https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/625
(1)
Create a 1 GiB file instead of 1 TiB, because
apparently, on MacOS, the file (sometimes?) is not
created sparse, and fills up users' disks:
https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/625
(2)
On darwin, SEEK_DATA is not the same as on Linux
( 2f8b555de2 )
so use the value provided by the unix package.
This fails at the moment:
$ go test ./tests/cli/
--- FAIL: TestMountPasswordEmpty (0.01s)
cli_test.go:430: socket file "/tmp/gocryptfs-test-parent-1026/3413782690/TestMountPasswordEmpty.753166857.sock" left behind
https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/634
Quoting fusefrontend_reverse/node_helpers.go :
// File names are padded to 16-byte multiples, encrypted and
// base64-encoded. We can encode at most 176 bytes to stay below the 255
// bytes limit:
// * base64(176 bytes) = 235 bytes
// * base64(192 bytes) = 256 bytes (over 255!)
// But the PKCS#7 padding is at least one byte. This means we can only use
// 175 bytes for the file name.
Noticed by @bailey27 at https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/499#issuecomment-955790427
Failure is:
# github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/v2/internal/nametransform
internal/nametransform/names.go:47:33: undefined: math.MaxInt
math.MaxInt was only introduced in Go 1.17. Use MaxInt32 instead,
which is good enough, even on amd64. It only has to be larger than
any name we might encounter.
Determines when to start hashing long names instead
of hardcoded 255. Will be used to alleviate "name too long"
issues some users see on cloud storage.
https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/499
Jobs currently fail like this:
/usr/bin/fusermount: option allow_other only allowed if 'user_allow_other' is set in /etc/fuse.conf
fs.Mount failed: fusermount exited with code 256
--- FAIL: TestForceOwner (0.05s)
main_test.go:438: mount failed: exit status 19
FAIL
FAIL github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/v2/tests/defaults 1.584s
Reported by codacity:
internal/cryptocore/cryptocore.go
Minor icon MINOR
Code Style
should omit type AEADTypeEnum from declaration of var BackendAESSIV; it will be inferred from the right-hand side
var BackendAESSIV AEADTypeEnum = AEADTypeEnum{"AES-SIV-512", "Go", siv_aead.NonceSize}
Minor icon MINOR
Code Style
should omit type AEADTypeEnum from declaration of var BackendXChaCha20Poly1305; it will be inferred from the right-hand side
var BackendXChaCha20Poly1305 AEADTypeEnum = AEADTypeEnum{"XChaCha20-Poly1305", "Go", chacha20poly1305.NonceSizeX}
Minor icon MINOR
Code Style
should omit type AEADTypeEnum from declaration of var BackendXChaCha20Poly1305OpenSSL; it will be inferred from the right-hand side
var BackendXChaCha20Poly1305OpenSSL AEADTypeEnum = AEADTypeEnum{"XChaCha20-Poly1305", "OpenSSL", chacha20poly1305.NonceSizeX}
Found 2 possible new issues
internal/cryptocore/cryptocore.go
Minor icon MINOR
Code Style
should omit type AEADTypeEnum from declaration of var BackendOpenSSL; it will be inferred from the right-hand side
var BackendOpenSSL AEADTypeEnum = AEADTypeEnum{"AES-GCM-256", "OpenSSL", 16}
Minor icon MINOR
Code Style
should omit type AEADTypeEnum from declaration of var BackendGoGCM; it will be inferred from the right-hand side
var BackendGoGCM AEADTypeEnum = AEADTypeEnum{"AES-GCM-256", "Go", 16}
